Review Process

AIGS 2027 follows a structured scientific and editorial evaluation process to ensure the academic quality, originality, and relevance of conference contributions. Full research papers normally undergo single-blind review, while research abstracts receive scientific, technical, and scope assessment.

Each submission undergoes an initial screening to assess compliance with the conference's academic and administrative requirements. The screening considers:

• Completeness of the manuscript and required author information.
• Relevance to the conference's scientific scope and research tracks.
• Originality, appropriate attribution, and compliance with academic integrity.
• Clarity of writing, scientific content, and basic formatting requirements.

Following initial screening, submissions may proceed to scientific evaluation, require correction and resubmission, or be declined where the applicable requirements are not satisfied.

• Passed Initial Screening: The submission proceeds to the appropriate scientific or technical evaluation stage.
• Resubmission Required: Authors receive instructions identifying the required corrections.
• Rejected: The submission does not proceed further in the conference evaluation process.

Submissions that pass initial screening are evaluated according to their scientific merit, technical contribution, research methodology, and suitability for presentation at AIGS 2027. Full papers normally undergo single-blind review, while abstracts undergo scientific and technical assessment.

Evaluation criteria include:

• Relevance to the AIGS 2027 conference scope and research tracks.
• Originality and significance of the research contribution.
• Scientific and methodological adequacy.
• Technical soundness and reliability of findings.
• Clarity, organization, and academic presentation.
• Research ethics, appropriate referencing, and reproducibility where applicable.

Following scientific evaluation, authors are notified of the conference decision through the applicable submission system or official conference communication. Possible outcomes include:

• Accepted: The contribution is accepted for conference presentation, subject to completion of the applicable registration and program requirements.
• Accepted and Revision Required: The contribution is accepted for presentation, subject to completion of specified revisions.
• Revision Required Before Final Decision: Authors are requested to revise and resubmit their work before an acceptance or rejection decision is issued.
• Rejected: The contribution is not accepted for presentation at AIGS 2027.

Authors are advised to monitor their submission accounts and official conference communications for review decisions, revision instructions, and registration information. At least one author of each accepted contribution is required to complete presenter registration by the published deadline.